Revolution in Litigation with Litigation Data
The word litigation is usually used to refer to a controversy before the court of law or simply put a lawsuit. The right to litigate or the right to have justice is a part of the constitution of almost every country in the World. In the litigation procedure, the court shall rule within the frames of the claim being filed in the procedure. The court cannot decline a ruling upon a competent claim.
During the litigation, the parties are obliged to present all the facts of their claims and to propose evidence to confirm the presented facts. The court is also authorized to confirm the facts not being stated by the parties and to reveal the evidence not being proposed by the parties.
During litigation, a judge makes the final decisions for the parties unless they have settled it before the trial. In such a case, the litigation is dismissed. There is always to possibility of Settlement and it can happen at any point during the litigation process. Proteus Discovery offers a free legal tool to speak with an attorney about the litigation process in a particular state.
Litigation data refers to all the information about court cases, helpful in supporting legal processes. It is mostly used by lawyers during case research. Proteus Discovery helps to find the right litigation data providers and databases. Given the impact of the litigation, it is more important to have access to the updated and relevant litigation data.
The main efforts lie in finding the correct and quality one. Proteus Discovery ensures the availability of relevant and quality data.
The risks to businesses arising out of data breaches are often given less importance. The demand for Litigation data is on the rise and the experiences are potentially significant.
The need to have good data continues until the legal suit ends. Having said this, even if lawyers operate on the basis that their legal data analytics tools, based on reliable data, it is important for them to understand that if the reliability of the data is questionable, their predictions and therefore advice to their clients may quickly become incorrect or irrelevant.
The disciplinary tribunals may have a stronger case if the respective Bar Associations have dictated that practicing lawyers must complete legal data analytics courses and strongly recommends lawyers to consider such reports when advising their clients.
Considering the growing interest and reliance by law firms on litigation data, it would be interesting to explore the trend of how such technology could be applied to fundamental research and case preparation.
This also helps in analysing the success rate of the appeals and whether any recent cases have succeeded with the same kind of appeal and thereby helping clients decide whether they would like to deploy more resources in the case or to cut losses and move on.
Ultimately, however, as much as data analytics can be useful in providing litigators and clients with a clearer idea of the landscape and environment that they are operating in, the litigator still needs to make his judgment call on how to proceed with the suit.
