Legal Document Review Attorney Process
Document review remains to be among the most expensive and challenging aspects of discovery — particularly in complex and large-scale matters. With constantly growing technologies, modes of communication, continually increasing data types and volumes required significant cross-functional expertise.
It is one of the most fascinating legal topics with less than one decade of existence in commerce. It includes following but is not limited to reviewing software, electronically created files that are analyzed by document review attorneys to deal with such platforms. It is an exciting part of the legal investigation for litigation or activities associated with it.
To make the explanation simple, words are chosen to be receptive and then the software becomes selective according to the words. Post it Legal professionals will go through it. The basic structure involves words selected according to the category set by the discovery process if a word is associated to say investments, or privileged communication, or another pattern that is chosen for the project.
Fast dating may be fun and instructive but not in the case with document review. Document review attorney and the team need time to get informed and then establish sound communication techniques accordingly.
All legal professionals, responsible for document review must go through training, though it is best to wait until the documents are reviewed. They need a detailed explanation of the tools being used. Additionally, they must sort what is responsive to discovery and what is not. Lists including specific documents and appropriate analysis make a fruitful end.
For corporate house litigants, document review outsourced, such as law firms or review service vendors. The reason being that the review is time-consuming and needs the engagement of huge resources, which internal legal departments are not equipped to handle in-house. Normally, it falls to a company outside counsel, who normally represent the corporation during the litigation process and at trial, so them leading the review effort usually makes sense.
Document Review is generally looked at as the conclusion of e-discovery efforts and the critical move ahead before producing documents to the other side. It is the point at which legal involvements traditionally gain a greater understanding of their case and can develop the strategies based on the information that is no more covered. However, advanced analytics technologies now allow legal teams to gain greater accurate intuitions before the review phase, a point that was addressed in the ECA section of this guide.
Cases that involve an extensive set of issues and many relevant players will always result in larger, more expensive review projects. But review remains influenced by previous ediscovery stages. Sloppy preservation practices or overly broad collections can result in more documents, creating more ESI to review than what is necessary to the matter, a problem that many companies experience.
Cost and technology are often the contexts while discussing Review. Having said this, Review is expensive and ranges between 70% and 80% of total e-discovery costs for the average case but planning, planning, and more planning make the successful document review.
